How We Evaluate Judges – Overall Factors
print this page

The JPEC evaluates judges using an objective, carefully-monitored process. Evaluations are based on performance in four (4) main areas:                 

  • Legal Ability
    • Understanding of the substantive law and relevant rules of procedure and evidence
    • Awareness and attentiveness to the factual and legal issues before the court
    • Proper application of statutes, judicial precedents, and other appropriate sources of legal authority                  
  • Fairness
    • Avoiding impropriety or the appearance of impropriety
    • Displaying fairness and impartiality toward all parties
    • Avoiding ex parte communications (communications where all parties in a court case are not present)                  
  • Communication Skills
    • Clearly explaining all oral decisions
    • Issuing clear written orders and/or opinions
    • For trial judges, clearly explaining relevant information to the jury                   
  • Preparation, Attentiveness, Temperament, and Control over Proceedings
    • Being prepared for all hearings and/or trials
    • Using court time efficiently
    • Issuing opinions or orders without unnecessary delay
    • Effective courtroom management
    • Effective overall case management